CathWorks vs Ultrasight
CathWorks vs Ultrasight, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and Ultrasight on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 80 against 28
- funding raised: $156M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,341 against 1,465
Ultrasight
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | AI-powered real-time guidance and quality assessment for cardiac ultrasound imaging. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Ultrasound, Cardiac |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $156M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | 1,465 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4 |
CathWorks vs Ultrasight: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or Ultrasight?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and Ultrasight compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 32/100), headcount (80 against 28), funding raised ($156M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (12,341 against 1,465).
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the Ultrasight review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.