CathWorks vs MedHub-AI
CathWorks vs MedHub-AI, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and MedHub-AI on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 28/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 80 against 13
- funding raised: $156M against $3.1M
- LinkedIn following: 12,341 against 2,597
MedHub-AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | MedHub-AI develops an AI-based decision support system for interventional cardiologists to enable precision cardiac care. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Decision Making, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | +4.9% |
| Total funding | $156M | $3.1M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | 2,597 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | MedHub-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
CathWorks vs MedHub-AI: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or MedHub-AI?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and MedHub-AI compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 30/100), domain rating (28/100 against 12/100), headcount (80 against 13), funding raised ($156M against $3.1M), LinkedIn following (12,341 against 2,597).
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the MedHub-AI review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.