CathWorks vs DiA Imaging Analysis
CathWorks vs DiA Imaging Analysis, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and DiA Imaging Analysis on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 80 against 19
- headcount growth: +5.6% against -15.2%
- funding raised: $156M against $30.1M
- LinkedIn following: 12,341 against 5,821
DiA Imaging Analysis
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | DiA Imaging Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | DiA Imaging Analysis provides AI-powered ultrasound software to automate image analysis for clinicians. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Heart Imaging, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Beer Sheva, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | DiA Imaging Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | -15.2% |
| Total funding | $156M | $30.1M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $65.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | 5,821 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | DiA Imaging Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | DiA Imaging Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
CathWorks vs DiA Imaging Analysis: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or DiA Imaging Analysis?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and DiA Imaging Analysis compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 22/100), headcount (80 against 19), headcount growth (+5.6% against -15.2%), funding raised ($156M against $30.1M), LinkedIn following (12,341 against 5,821).
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the DiA Imaging Analysis review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.