CathWorks vs Cherry Imaging
CathWorks vs Cherry Imaging, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CathWorks is on 62/100 and Cherry Imaging on 32/100.
Where each one leads
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 80 against 12
Cherry Imaging
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CathWorks | Cherry Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. | Cherry Imaging develops advanced 3D imaging and AI-powered analysis solutions for aesthetic medicine, providing precise measurements and treatment planning. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, Dermatology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CathWorks | Cherry Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 80 | 12 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $156M | Not published |
| Latest round | Strategic | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,341 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CathWorks | Cherry Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 32/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 11/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CathWorks | Cherry Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
CathWorks vs Cherry Imaging: common questions
Which is better, CathWorks or Cherry Imaging?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CathWorks and Cherry Imaging compare on the numbers?
CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (29/100 against 5/100), headcount (80 against 12).
Read the full CathWorks review and pricing or the Cherry Imaging review and pricing. You can also browse other CathWorks alternatives we track.