Catch vs CiValue
Catch vs CiValue, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Catch is on 46/100 and CiValue on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Catch
- headcount growth: +23.5% against -60.3%
CiValue
- our overall score: 57/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 42/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 50 against 26
- LinkedIn following: 43,689 against 1,548
At a glance
| Measure | Catch | CiValue |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Transforming in-store grocery shopping into an engaging and data-rich experience for shoppers and retailers. | ciValue provides high-frequency retailers with cloud-based customer analytics and personalized recommendations using predictive data science. |
| Category | Retail, RetailTech, MarTech, AdTech | Retail, Analytics, Customer Intelligence, RetailTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Catch | CiValue |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 26 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.5% | -60.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $16.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,548 | 43,689 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Catch | CiValue |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 14/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Catch | CiValue |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
Catch vs CiValue: common questions
Which is better, Catch or CiValue?
On our 0-100 score CiValue rates higher (57/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Catch and CiValue compare on the numbers?
Catch leads on headcount growth (+23.5% against -60.3%). CiValue leads on our overall score (57/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 42/100), domain rating (42/100 against 27/100), headcount (50 against 26), LinkedIn following (43,689 against 1,548).
Read the full Catch review and pricing or the CiValue review and pricing. You can also browse other Catch alternatives we track.