CASTOR vs MagnusMetal
CASTOR vs MagnusMetal, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CASTOR is on 53/100 and MagnusMetal on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CASTOR
- domain rating: 36/100 against 17/100
- LinkedIn following: 3,129 against 2,433
MagnusMetal
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 90 against 30
- funding raised: $88.0M against $5.9M
At a glance
| Measure | CASTOR | MagnusMetal |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated 3D printing software for identifying cost reduction opportunities. | Magnus Metal offers Digital Casting™ technology, a digital, Industry 4.0 solution for metal casting. |
| Category | 3D Printing, 3D, Manufacturing, Industrial | Industrial, 3D Printing, Manufacturing, Industry 4.0 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CASTOR | MagnusMetal |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 90 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.0% | +15.4% |
| Total funding | $5.9M | $88.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,129 | 2,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CASTOR | MagnusMetal |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 17/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CASTOR | MagnusMetal |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
CASTOR vs MagnusMetal: common questions
Which is better, CASTOR or MagnusMetal?
On our 0-100 score MagnusMetal rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CASTOR and MagnusMetal compare on the numbers?
CASTOR leads on domain rating (36/100 against 17/100), LinkedIn following (3,129 against 2,433). MagnusMetal leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), headcount (90 against 30), funding raised ($88.0M against $5.9M).
Read the full CASTOR review and pricing or the MagnusMetal review and pricing. You can also browse other CASTOR alternatives we track.