Castle vs Queue-it
Castle vs Queue-it, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Castle is on 60/100 and Queue-it on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Castle
- our overall score: 60/100 against 53/100
- LinkedIn following: 18,824 against 9,108
Queue-it
- domain rating: 76/100 against 66/100
- headcount: 184 against 52
At a glance
| Measure | Castle | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developer-grade infrastructure to stop bots, abuse, and fraud by transforming user behavior into real-time signals. | Global online traffic orchestration solutions provider that helps businesses manage online traffic surges and prevent bot abuse. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Authentication, API Platform | Cybersecurity, IT Operations, Online Traffic Orchestration, Virtual Waiting Room |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Castle | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 52 | 184 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +24.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $9.2M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Majority Equity Investment |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,824 | 9,108 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Castle | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Castle | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | AWS |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Lovable | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Astro, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
Castle vs Queue-it: common questions
Which is better, Castle or Queue-it?
On our 0-100 score Castle rates higher (60/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Castle and Queue-it compare on the numbers?
Castle leads on our overall score (60/100 against 53/100), LinkedIn following (18,824 against 9,108). Queue-it leads on domain rating (76/100 against 66/100), headcount (184 against 52).
Read the full Castle review and pricing or the Queue-it review and pricing. You can also browse other Castle alternatives we track.