Cartken vs Starship Technologies
Cartken vs Starship Technologies, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cartken is on 48/100 and Starship Technologies on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Cartken
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Starship Technologies
- our overall score: 64/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 563 against 44
- funding raised: $595M against $13.0M
- LinkedIn following: 44,255 against 8,039
At a glance
| Measure | Cartken | Starship Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven autonomous robots for indoor and outdoor material handling and last-mile delivery. | Develops and operates autonomous, electric delivery robots for last-mile logistics. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Autonomous Vehicles | Robotics, Autonomous Vehicles, LogisticsTech, Delivery Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, services, platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Fremont, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cartken | Starship Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 44 | 563 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -5.0% |
| Total funding | $13.0M | $595M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,039 | 44,255 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cartken | Starship Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cartken | Starship Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cartken | Starship Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Multi-Building Delivery, Autonomous Material Handling, Last-mile delivery, All-terrain capability at scale, All-Weather & Day/Night Navigation, Elevator, gates, doors integration | Not published |
Cartken vs Starship Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Cartken or Starship Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Starship Technologies rates higher (64/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cartken and Starship Technologies compare on the numbers?
Starship Technologies leads on our overall score (64/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 32/100), domain rating (71/100 against 37/100), headcount (563 against 44), funding raised ($595M against $13.0M), LinkedIn following (44,255 against 8,039).
Read the full Cartken review and pricing or the Starship Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Cartken alternatives we track.