Cartken vs Pickommerce
Cartken vs Pickommerce, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cartken is on 48/100 and Pickommerce on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cartken
- domain rating: 37/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 44 against 30
- funding raised: $13.0M against $3.4M
- LinkedIn following: 8,039 against 1,703
Pickommerce
- our overall score: 54/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 32/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cartken | Pickommerce |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven autonomous robots for indoor and outdoor material handling and last-mile delivery. | Develops an autonomous pick and pack system for logistics warehouses using robotics. |
| Category | Robotics, Industrial Robotics, Warehouse Robotics, Autonomous Vehicles | Robotics, Warehouse, Transport and Logistics, Warehouse Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Fremont, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cartken | Pickommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 44 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +72.3% |
| Total funding | $13.0M | $3.4M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,039 | 1,703 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cartken | Pickommerce |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 24/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cartken | Pickommerce |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Wix |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cartken | Pickommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Multi-Building Delivery, Autonomous Material Handling, Last-mile delivery, All-terrain capability at scale, All-Weather & Day/Night Navigation, Elevator, gates, doors integration | Not published |
Cartken vs Pickommerce: common questions
Which is better, Cartken or Pickommerce?
On our 0-100 score Pickommerce rates higher (54/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cartken and Pickommerce compare on the numbers?
Cartken leads on domain rating (37/100 against 24/100), headcount (44 against 30), funding raised ($13.0M against $3.4M), LinkedIn following (8,039 against 1,703). Pickommerce leads on our overall score (54/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 32/100).
Read the full Cartken review and pricing or the Pickommerce review and pricing. You can also browse other Cartken alternatives we track.