CardinalOps vs Torq
CardinalOps vs Torq, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardinalOps is on 63/100 and Torq on 65/100.
Where each one leads
CardinalOps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Torq
- domain rating: 70/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 352 against 37
- headcount growth: +40.8% against +4.2%
- funding raised: $190M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 41,530 against 3,062
At a glance
| Measure | CardinalOps | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates security detection posture assessment and gap elimination for SIEM/XDR. | Hyperautomation platform unifying and automating security infrastructure for enhanced protection and productivity. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevSecOps, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Development, Cybersecurity, Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardinalOps | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 352 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | +40.8% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $190M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,062 | 41,530 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | CardinalOps | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Anyone have experience working at Torq?. I’m currently interviewing at Torq and while the product and client reviews look good, Repvue shows average quota attainment at 19%.”r/techsales
CardinalOps vs Torq: common questions
Which is better, CardinalOps or Torq?
On our 0-100 score Torq rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardinalOps and Torq compare on the numbers?
Torq leads on domain rating (70/100 against 43/100), headcount (352 against 37), headcount growth (+40.8% against +4.2%), funding raised ($190M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (41,530 against 3,062).
What do real users say about CardinalOps and Torq?
Torq: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techsales.
Read the full CardinalOps review and pricing or the Torq review and pricing. You can also browse other CardinalOps alternatives we track.