CardinalOps vs Stream Security
CardinalOps vs Stream Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardinalOps is on 63/100 and Stream Security on 65/100.
Where each one leads
CardinalOps
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 41/100
- headcount growth: +4.2% against -27.1%
Stream Security
- domain rating: 59/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 64 against 37
- funding raised: $60.0M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,380 against 3,062
At a glance
| Measure | CardinalOps | Stream Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates security detection posture assessment and gap elimination for SIEM/XDR. | Automates security vulnerability detection and remediation with immediate root cause analysis using a live system model. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevSecOps, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardinalOps | Stream Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 64 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | -27.1% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $60.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,062 | 14,380 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Stream Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Stream Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
CardinalOps vs Stream Security: common questions
Which is better, CardinalOps or Stream Security?
On our 0-100 score Stream Security rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardinalOps and Stream Security compare on the numbers?
CardinalOps leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 41/100), headcount growth (+4.2% against -27.1%). Stream Security leads on domain rating (59/100 against 43/100), headcount (64 against 37), funding raised ($60.0M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (14,380 against 3,062).
Read the full CardinalOps review and pricing or the Stream Security review and pricing. You can also browse other CardinalOps alternatives we track.