CardinalOps vs Orca Security
CardinalOps vs Orca Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardinalOps is on 63/100 and Orca Security on 71/100.
Where each one leads
CardinalOps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Orca Security
- our overall score: 71/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 519 against 37
- funding raised: $632M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 127,965 against 3,062
At a glance
| Measure | CardinalOps | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates security detection posture assessment and gap elimination for SIEM/XDR. | Agentless cloud security platform identifying and remediating risks across AWS, Azure, and GCP. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevSecOps, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Compliance, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardinalOps | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 519 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | +4.3% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $632M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.8B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,062 | 127,965 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 80/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Parsely |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
CardinalOps vs Orca Security: common questions
Which is better, CardinalOps or Orca Security?
On our 0-100 score Orca Security rates higher (71/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardinalOps and Orca Security compare on the numbers?
Orca Security leads on our overall score (71/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 47/100), domain rating (75/100 against 43/100), headcount (519 against 37), funding raised ($632M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (127,965 against 3,062).
Read the full CardinalOps review and pricing or the Orca Security review and pricing. You can also browse other CardinalOps alternatives we track.