CardinalOps vs Hunters AI
CardinalOps vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardinalOps is on 63/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
CardinalOps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 63/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 180 against 37
- funding raised: $118M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 3,062
At a glance
| Measure | CardinalOps | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates security detection posture assessment and gap elimination for SIEM/XDR. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevSecOps, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardinalOps | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 180 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $118M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,062 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
CardinalOps vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, CardinalOps or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardinalOps and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 63/100), domain rating (61/100 against 43/100), headcount (180 against 37), funding raised ($118M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 3,062).
Read the full CardinalOps review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other CardinalOps alternatives we track.