CardinalOps vs Exabeam
CardinalOps vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardinalOps is on 63/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
CardinalOps
- headcount growth: +4.2% against +2.8%
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 794 against 37
- funding raised: $390M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 3,062
At a glance
| Measure | CardinalOps | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates security detection posture assessment and gap elimination for SIEM/XDR. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevSecOps, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardinalOps | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $390M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,062 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardinalOps | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CardinalOps vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, CardinalOps or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardinalOps and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
CardinalOps leads on headcount growth (+4.2% against +2.8%). Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), domain rating (76/100 against 43/100), headcount (794 against 37), funding raised ($390M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 3,062).
Read the full CardinalOps review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other CardinalOps alternatives we track.