CardiacSense vs X-trodes
CardiacSense vs X-trodes, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and X-trodes on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- headcount: 39 against 28
- headcount growth: +3.3% against +2.3%
- funding raised: $10.8M against $8.2M
- LinkedIn following: 7,325 against 5,140
X-trodes
- our overall score: 56/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | X-trodes |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Revolutionizing electrophysiology with innovative, wireless, wearable Smart Skin technology for advanced monitoring. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Healthcare, Biotech, Wearable, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | X-trodes |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | +2.3% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $8.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 5,140 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | X-trodes |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | X-trodes |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | X-trodes |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs X-trodes: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or X-trodes?
On our 0-100 score X-trodes rates higher (56/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and X-trodes compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on headcount (39 against 28), headcount growth (+3.3% against +2.3%), funding raised ($10.8M against $8.2M), LinkedIn following (7,325 against 5,140). X-trodes leads on our overall score (56/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 30/100).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and X-trodes?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the X-trodes review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.