CardiacSense vs VenoVision
CardiacSense vs VenoVision, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and VenoVision on 39/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- our overall score: 51/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 39 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 7,325 against 129
VenoVision
- headcount growth: +24.1% against +3.3%
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | VenoVision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Contactless imaging and hemodynamic monitoring for non-invasive cardiac data and ICU admission reduction. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | MedTech, HealthTech, Cardiology, Medical Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | VenoVision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | +24.1% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | Not published |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 129 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | VenoVision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | VenoVision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | VenoVision |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs VenoVision: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or VenoVision?
On our 0-100 score CardiacSense rates higher (51/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and VenoVision compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on our overall score (51/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), domain rating (34/100 against 3/100), headcount (39 against 2), LinkedIn following (7,325 against 129). VenoVision leads on headcount growth (+24.1% against +3.3%).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and VenoVision?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the VenoVision review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.