CardiacSense vs Neurolief
CardiacSense vs Neurolief, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and Neurolief on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- domain rating: 34/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 39 against 30
- headcount growth: +3.3% against -2.9%
Neurolief
- our overall score: 54/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $15.0M against $10.8M
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | Neurolief |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Neurolief develops proprietary digital therapeutics neuromodulation technology to treat neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders like migraine and depression. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Healthcare, Brain, Migraine, Neuromodulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Netanya, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | Neurolief |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | -2.9% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 6,921 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Neurolief |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Neurolief |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | Neurolief |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs Neurolief: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or Neurolief?
On our 0-100 score Neurolief rates higher (54/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and Neurolief compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on domain rating (34/100 against 25/100), headcount (39 against 30), headcount growth (+3.3% against -2.9%). Neurolief leads on our overall score (54/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($15.0M against $10.8M).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and Neurolief?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the Neurolief review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.