CardiacSense vs NavonTech
CardiacSense vs NavonTech, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and NavonTech on 20/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- our overall score: 51/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 39 against 3
NavonTech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | NavonTech |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Developed GlycemiaCare, a noninvasive wearable for identifying nocturnal hypoglycemia in diabetics. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Healthcare, Monitor, Diabetes, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B, B2B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | NavonTech |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.8M | Not published |
| Latest round | Not published | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | NavonTech |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | NavonTech |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | NavonTech |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs NavonTech: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or NavonTech?
On our 0-100 score CardiacSense rates higher (51/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and NavonTech compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on our overall score (51/100 against 20/100), domain rating (34/100 against 5/100), headcount (39 against 3).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and NavonTech?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the NavonTech review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.