CardiacSense vs MakeSense Digital Health
CardiacSense vs MakeSense Digital Health, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and MakeSense Digital Health on 20/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- our overall score: 51/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 39 against 2
MakeSense Digital Health
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | MakeSense Digital Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | AI-powered solution to measure nutritional content of meals using wearable sensors. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Sensor, Healthcare, Diabetes, Nutrition |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | MakeSense Digital Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.8M | Not published |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | MakeSense Digital Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | MakeSense Digital Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | MakeSense Digital Health |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs MakeSense Digital Health: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or MakeSense Digital Health?
On our 0-100 score CardiacSense rates higher (51/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and MakeSense Digital Health compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on our overall score (51/100 against 20/100), domain rating (34/100 against 7/100), headcount (39 against 2). MakeSense Digital Health leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 30/100).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and MakeSense Digital Health?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the MakeSense Digital Health review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.