CardiacSense vs Lifebeam Vi
CardiacSense vs Lifebeam Vi, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and Lifebeam Vi on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lifebeam Vi
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 41/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 193 against 39
- headcount growth: +67.4% against +3.3%
- funding raised: $38.7M against $10.8M
- LinkedIn following: 13,264 against 7,325
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Vi-Labs provides enterprise AI for health, supercharging digital health companies with engagement, retention, and LTV solutions. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Fitness, Wearable, HealthTech, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 193 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | +67.4% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $38.7M |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 13,264 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 40/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
“Lifebeam Vi Wraps Kickstarter As The Most Well-Funded Fitness Wearable Ever.”r/wearables
CardiacSense vs Lifebeam Vi: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or Lifebeam Vi?
On our 0-100 score Lifebeam Vi rates higher (53/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and Lifebeam Vi compare on the numbers?
Lifebeam Vi leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 30/100), domain rating (41/100 against 34/100), headcount (193 against 39), headcount growth (+67.4% against +3.3%), funding raised ($38.7M against $10.8M), LinkedIn following (13,264 against 7,325).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and Lifebeam Vi?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID. Lifebeam Vi: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wearables.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the Lifebeam Vi review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.