CardiacSense vs IsenseU
CardiacSense vs IsenseU, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and IsenseU on 40/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- our overall score: 51/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 39 against 1
- funding raised: $10.8M against $3.7M
IsenseU
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | IsenseU |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | HealthTech company providing patented IoT solutions for infant breastfeeding intake monitoring. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Breastfeeding, Data Science |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | IsenseU |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $3.7M |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | IsenseU |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | IsenseU |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | IsenseU |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs IsenseU: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or IsenseU?
On our 0-100 score CardiacSense rates higher (51/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and IsenseU compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on our overall score (51/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 22/100), headcount (39 against 1), funding raised ($10.8M against $3.7M).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and IsenseU?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the IsenseU review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.