CardiacSense vs Donisi Health
CardiacSense vs Donisi Health, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and Donisi Health on 55/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- domain rating: 34/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 39 against 7
- headcount growth: +3.3% against -29.9%
- LinkedIn following: 7,325 against 1,455
Donisi Health
- our overall score: 55/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $27.0M against $10.8M
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | Donisi Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | MedTech company developing a remote monitoring solution for Congestive Heart Failure patients. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Healthcare, Telemedicine, IoT, Monitor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | Donisi Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | -29.9% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $27.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 1,455 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Donisi Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Donisi Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | Donisi Health |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs Donisi Health: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or Donisi Health?
On our 0-100 score Donisi Health rates higher (55/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and Donisi Health compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on domain rating (34/100 against 26/100), headcount (39 against 7), headcount growth (+3.3% against -29.9%), LinkedIn following (7,325 against 1,455). Donisi Health leads on our overall score (55/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($27.0M against $10.8M).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and Donisi Health?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the Donisi Health review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.