CardiacSense vs CNOGA Medical
CardiacSense vs CNOGA Medical, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and CNOGA Medical on 52/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- domain rating: 34/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 39 against 19
- headcount growth: +3.3% against -10.9%
- LinkedIn following: 7,325 against 2,705
CNOGA Medical
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $62.5M against $10.8M
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | CNOGA Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Cnoga Medical develops and manufactures non-invasive, pain-free medical devices for personal and professional remote medical care. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Healthcare, Diabetes, Monitoring, Non-invasive |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Caesarea, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | CNOGA Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | -10.9% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $62.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Strategic |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 2,705 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | CNOGA Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | CNOGA Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | CNOGA Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs CNOGA Medical: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or CNOGA Medical?
On our 0-100 score CNOGA Medical rates higher (52/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and CNOGA Medical compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on domain rating (34/100 against 25/100), headcount (39 against 19), headcount growth (+3.3% against -10.9%), LinkedIn following (7,325 against 2,705). CNOGA Medical leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($62.5M against $10.8M).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and CNOGA Medical?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the CNOGA Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.