CardiacSense vs Clair Labs
CardiacSense vs Clair Labs, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CardiacSense is on 51/100 and Clair Labs on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CardiacSense
- domain rating: 34/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 39 against 3
- headcount growth: +3.3% against -29.3%
- LinkedIn following: 7,325 against 1,032
Clair Labs
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | CardiacSense | Clair Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. | Clair Labs develops medical-grade, contact-free vital signs sensing technology powered by deep learning and computer vision for proactive healthcare. |
| Category | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable | Healthcare, Monitor, Biomarkers, Patient |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CardiacSense | Clair Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.3% | -29.3% |
| Total funding | $10.8M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | $21.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,325 | 1,032 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Clair Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CardiacSense | Clair Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CardiacSense | Clair Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
CardiacSense vs Clair Labs: common questions
Which is better, CardiacSense or Clair Labs?
On our 0-100 score Clair Labs rates higher (53/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CardiacSense and Clair Labs compare on the numbers?
CardiacSense leads on domain rating (34/100 against 5/100), headcount (39 against 3), headcount growth (+3.3% against -29.3%), LinkedIn following (7,325 against 1,032). Clair Labs leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 30/100).
What do real users say about CardiacSense and Clair Labs?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full CardiacSense review and pricing or the Clair Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other CardiacSense alternatives we track.