Cardetra vs FIS
Cardetra vs FIS, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cardetra is on 8/100 and FIS on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Cardetra
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
FIS
- our overall score: 69/100 against 8/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cardetra | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cardetra provides a platform for managing and optimizing card payment acceptance for businesses. | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Merchant Services | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 1968 |
| Headquarters | Brighton, England | Jacksonville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cardetra | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $11B |
| Latest round | Not published | Series 16 |
| Valuation | Not published | $33B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cardetra | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 8/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cardetra | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
Cardetra vs FIS: common questions
Which is better, Cardetra or FIS?
On our 0-100 score FIS rates higher (69/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cardetra and FIS compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on our overall score (69/100 against 8/100).
Read the full Cardetra review and pricing or the FIS review and pricing. You can also browse other Cardetra alternatives we track.