Carbyne 911 vs Shield-IoT
Carbyne 911 vs Shield-IoT, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Carbyne 911 is on 61/100 and Shield-IoT on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Carbyne 911
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 230 against 15
- funding raised: $241M against $11.0M
- LinkedIn following: 28,589 against 1,223
Shield-IoT
- agent readiness: 29/100 against 26/100
At a glance
| Measure | Carbyne 911 | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Carbyne provides advanced contact center technologies for emergency services, delivering real-time rich data like live video and precise location to dispatchers. | Cybersecurity and analytics for mass-scale B2B IoT and IIoT networks. |
| Category | Smart City, Emergency, Indoor GPS, Homeland Security | Smart City, Cybersecurity, Automotive, Industry 4.0 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Carbyne 911 | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 230 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -9.7% |
| Total funding | $241M | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $800M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,589 | 1,223 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Carbyne 911 | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Carbyne 911 | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
Carbyne 911 vs Shield-IoT: common questions
Which is better, Carbyne 911 or Shield-IoT?
On our 0-100 score Carbyne 911 rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Carbyne 911 and Shield-IoT compare on the numbers?
Carbyne 911 leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), domain rating (59/100 against 30/100), headcount (230 against 15), funding raised ($241M against $11.0M), LinkedIn following (28,589 against 1,223). Shield-IoT leads on agent readiness (29/100 against 26/100).
Read the full Carbyne 911 review and pricing or the Shield-IoT review and pricing. You can also browse other Carbyne 911 alternatives we track.