CarbonX vs Redwood Materials
CarbonX vs Redwood Materials, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CarbonX is on 50/100 and Redwood Materials on 59/100.
Where each one leads
CarbonX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Redwood Materials
- our overall score: 59/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $1.1B against $22.4M
At a glance
| Measure | CarbonX | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Dutch startup producing innovative 3D carbon structures for advanced battery anodes. | Recycling and refining battery materials for electric vehicles and energy storage. |
| Category | Battery Technology, Energy Storage, Advanced Manufacturing, Materials Science | Battery Technology, Energy Storage, EV Charging, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Groningen, Netherlands | Carson City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CarbonX | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 773 |
| Total funding | $22.4M | $1.1B |
| Latest round | Series A | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 78,725 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CarbonX | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CarbonX | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Nuxt |
CarbonX vs Redwood Materials: common questions
Which is better, CarbonX or Redwood Materials?
On our 0-100 score Redwood Materials rates higher (59/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CarbonX and Redwood Materials compare on the numbers?
Redwood Materials leads on our overall score (59/100 against 50/100), domain rating (67/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($1.1B against $22.4M).
Read the full CarbonX review and pricing or the Redwood Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other CarbonX alternatives we track.