CarbonClick vs Flowcarbon
CarbonClick vs Flowcarbon, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CarbonClick is on 48/100 and Flowcarbon on 49/100.
Where each one leads
CarbonClick
- domain rating: 62/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 14 against 11
- headcount growth: +65.5% against -38.1%
Flowcarbon
- LinkedIn following: 11,967 against 4,040
At a glance
| Measure | CarbonClick | Flowcarbon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CarbonClick provides a platform for businesses to offset their carbon emissions. | Flowcarbon provides bespoke capital solutions and project finance expertise for innovative companies in frontier industries like infrastructure and decarbonization. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Carbon Capture, Sustainability, Environmental Services | Climate Tech, Carbon Credits, Sustainability, Project Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | Services |
| Founded | 2019 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Auckland, New Zealand | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CarbonClick | Flowcarbon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 11 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +65.5% | -38.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $70.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,040 | 11,967 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CarbonClick | Flowcarbon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CarbonClick | Flowcarbon |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | CarbonClick | Flowcarbon |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 1 negative across 5 threads |
“Hedera and their ecosystem partners are building an entire industry from the ground up that will be worth hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars. Flowcarbon Partners with The HBAR Foundation to Provide dMRV Capabilities for the ”r/Hedera
CarbonClick vs Flowcarbon: common questions
Which is better, CarbonClick or Flowcarbon?
On our 0-100 score Flowcarbon rates higher (49/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CarbonClick and Flowcarbon compare on the numbers?
CarbonClick leads on domain rating (62/100 against 44/100), headcount (14 against 11), headcount growth (+65.5% against -38.1%). Flowcarbon leads on LinkedIn following (11,967 against 4,040).
What do real users say about CarbonClick and Flowcarbon?
Flowcarbon: 4 positive and 1 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Hedera.
Read the full CarbonClick review and pricing or the Flowcarbon review and pricing. You can also browse other CarbonClick alternatives we track.