Carbon vs Stratasys
Carbon vs Stratasys, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Carbon is on 71/100 and Stratasys on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Carbon
- our overall score: 71/100 against 53/100
Stratasys
- headcount: 1,994 against 518
- LinkedIn following: 114,432 against 64,666
At a glance
| Measure | Carbon | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A 3D printing company focused on creating high-performance, custom polymer parts. | Global leader in additive technology solutions for diverse industries, focusing on customer business requirements. |
| Category | 3D Printing, Advanced Manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing, Materials Science | 3D Printing, Additive Manufacturing, Industrial Automation, Aerospace |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Eden Prairie, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Carbon | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 518 | 1,994 |
| Open roles | 16 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $128M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,666 | 114,432 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Carbon | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Carbon | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Carbon | Stratasys |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 3 negative across 5 threads |
“Spent the last 6 months or so gutting this old Stratasys and replacing everything from the control boards to the print heads. Currently sporting dual water cooled hotends with a lifting support printhead both capable of 500+C, a 1000W verti”r/3Dprinting
Carbon vs Stratasys: common questions
Which is better, Carbon or Stratasys?
On our 0-100 score Carbon rates higher (71/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Carbon and Stratasys compare on the numbers?
Carbon leads on our overall score (71/100 against 53/100). Stratasys leads on headcount (1,994 against 518), LinkedIn following (114,432 against 64,666).
What do real users say about Carbon and Stratasys?
Stratasys: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/3Dprinting.
Read the full Carbon review and pricing or the Stratasys review and pricing. You can also browse other Carbon alternatives we track.