Carbon vs Nano Dimension
Carbon vs Nano Dimension, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Carbon is on 71/100 and Nano Dimension on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Carbon
- our overall score: 71/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 518 against 221
- LinkedIn following: 64,666 against 32,271
Nano Dimension
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Carbon | Nano Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A 3D printing company focused on creating high-performance, custom polymer parts. | Nano Dimension provides intelligent machines for the fabrication of Additively Manufactured Electronics (AME). |
| Category | 3D Printing, Advanced Manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing, Materials Science | 3D Printing, Manufacturing, Electronics, Printed Circuit Board (PCB) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Ness Ziona, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Carbon | Nano Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 518 | 221 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.1% |
| Open roles | 16 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $18.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Post-IPO |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,666 | 32,271 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Carbon | Nano Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 24/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Carbon | Nano Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Carbon | Nano Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 1 thread |
“Feels like Nano Dimension isn’t really Nano Dimension anymore. After selling off its original AME product line and moving in this Markforged-style direction, it comes across as a completely different company than what many of us originally ”r/NNDM
Carbon vs Nano Dimension: common questions
Which is better, Carbon or Nano Dimension?
On our 0-100 score Carbon rates higher (71/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Carbon and Nano Dimension compare on the numbers?
Carbon leads on our overall score (71/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 39/100), domain rating (69/100 against 57/100), headcount (518 against 221), LinkedIn following (64,666 against 32,271).
What do real users say about Carbon and Nano Dimension?
Nano Dimension: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/NNDM.
Read the full Carbon review and pricing or the Nano Dimension review and pricing. You can also browse other Carbon alternatives we track.