Carbon vs Claro 3D
Carbon vs Claro 3D, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Carbon is on 71/100 and Claro 3D on 18/100.
Where each one leads
Carbon
- our overall score: 71/100 against 18/100
- headcount: 518 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 64,666 against 63
Claro 3D
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Carbon | Claro 3D |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A 3D printing company focused on creating high-performance, custom polymer parts. | Develops production-ready Laser Induced Forward Transfer (LIFT) 3D printing technology for high-precision material deposition. |
| Category | 3D Printing, Advanced Manufacturing, Additive Manufacturing, Materials Science | 3D Printing, Advanced Manufacturing, Industrial Automation, Additive Manufacturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | Hardware |
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Rehovot, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Carbon | Claro 3D |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 518 | 4 |
| Open roles | 16 | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,666 | 63 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Carbon | Claro 3D |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 18/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 7/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 25/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Carbon | Claro 3D |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
Carbon vs Claro 3D: common questions
Which is better, Carbon or Claro 3D?
On our 0-100 score Carbon rates higher (71/100 against 18/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Carbon and Claro 3D compare on the numbers?
Carbon leads on our overall score (71/100 against 18/100), headcount (518 against 4), LinkedIn following (64,666 against 63).
Read the full Carbon review and pricing or the Claro 3D review and pricing. You can also browse other Carbon alternatives we track.