Carbon Clean vs Membrane Technology & Research
Carbon Clean vs Membrane Technology & Research, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Carbon Clean is on 49/100 and Membrane Technology & Research on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Carbon Clean
- domain rating: 56/100 against 28/100
- funding raised: $195M against $27.0M
Membrane Technology & Research
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Carbon Clean | Membrane Technology & Research |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial carbon capture technology company offering modular CycloneCC systems that retrofit onto existing industrial emitters. | Membrane technology for carbon capture, hydrogen, and natural gas. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Carbon Capture, Industrial Decarbonization, Carbon Removal | Climate Tech, Carbon Capture, Membrane Technology, Clean Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Newark, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Carbon Clean | Membrane Technology & Research |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 170 | Not published |
| Total funding | $195M | $27.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Carbon Clean | Membrane Technology & Research |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Carbon Clean | Membrane Technology & Research |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Carbon Clean vs Membrane Technology & Research: common questions
Which is better, Carbon Clean or Membrane Technology & Research?
On our 0-100 score Membrane Technology & Research rates higher (51/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Carbon Clean and Membrane Technology & Research compare on the numbers?
Carbon Clean leads on domain rating (56/100 against 28/100), funding raised ($195M against $27.0M).
Read the full Carbon Clean review and pricing or the Membrane Technology & Research review and pricing. You can also browse other Carbon Clean alternatives we track.