Captain's Eye vs GOARC
Captain's Eye vs GOARC, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Captain's Eye is on 54/100 and GOARC on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Captain's Eye
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 35 against 28
- headcount growth: +37.4% against -17.9%
- LinkedIn following: 7,757 against 3,898
GOARC
- domain rating: 30/100 against 24/100
- funding raised: $8.4M against $4.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Captain's Eye | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered maritime safety and security system to prevent ship loss, damage, and pollution. | Real-time safety intelligence platform for industrial sectors to prevent accidents and reduce risks. |
| Category | Maritime, Video, Security, Maritime Tech | Safety, Industrial, Security, Employee Risk |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Haifa, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Captain's Eye | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +37.4% | -17.9% |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $8.4M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,757 | 3,898 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Captain's Eye | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 24/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Captain's Eye | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Lovable |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Captain's Eye vs GOARC: common questions
Which is better, Captain's Eye or GOARC?
On our 0-100 score GOARC rates higher (55/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Captain's Eye and GOARC compare on the numbers?
Captain's Eye leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 32/100), headcount (35 against 28), headcount growth (+37.4% against -17.9%), LinkedIn following (7,757 against 3,898). GOARC leads on domain rating (30/100 against 24/100), funding raised ($8.4M against $4.0M).
Read the full Captain's Eye review and pricing or the GOARC review and pricing. You can also browse other Captain's Eye alternatives we track.