Cap-xx vs Freyr Battery
Cap-xx vs Freyr Battery, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cap-xx is on 50/100 and Freyr Battery on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Cap-xx
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Freyr Battery
- our overall score: 57/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 241 against 22
- headcount growth: +116.7% against +70.0%
- funding raised: $2.7B against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 53,256 against 2,249
At a glance
| Measure | Cap-xx | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Australian manufacturer of thin, flat supercapacitors and energy management systems. | Developing and manufacturing next-generation battery cells for clean energy solutions. |
| Category | Energy Storage, Supercapacitors, Advanced Manufacturing, Industrial IoT | Energy Storage, Battery Technology, Clean Energy, Advanced Manufacturing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1997 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cap-xx | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 241 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +70.0% | +116.7% |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $2.7B |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,249 | 53,256 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cap-xx | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cap-xx | Freyr Battery |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Payments | Apple PAY | Not detected |
Cap-xx vs Freyr Battery: common questions
Which is better, Cap-xx or Freyr Battery?
On our 0-100 score Freyr Battery rates higher (57/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cap-xx and Freyr Battery compare on the numbers?
Freyr Battery leads on our overall score (57/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 31/100), domain rating (54/100 against 43/100), headcount (241 against 22), headcount growth (+116.7% against +70.0%), funding raised ($2.7B against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (53,256 against 2,249).
Read the full Cap-xx review and pricing or the Freyr Battery review and pricing. You can also browse other Cap-xx alternatives we track.