Canonical vs SUSE
Canonical vs SUSE, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Canonical is on 61/100 and SUSE on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Canonical
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
SUSE
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 2,705 against 1,200
- funding raised: $4.9B against $348K
At a glance
| Measure | Canonical | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Canonical develops and supports Ubuntu, a leading open-source operating system for cloud, servers, and edge devices. | Open, agile, and enterprise-grade Linux and cloud infrastructure solutions. |
| Category | Open Source, Operating System, Cloud Computing, Enterprise Software | Cloud Computing, Enterprise Software, Open Source, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 1992 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Canonical | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,200 | 2,705 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -1.0% |
| Total funding | $348K | $4.9B |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Acquisition |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 195,138 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Canonical | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Canonical | SUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Canonical vs SUSE: common questions
Which is better, Canonical or SUSE?
On our 0-100 score Canonical rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Canonical and SUSE compare on the numbers?
Canonical leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100). SUSE leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), headcount (2,705 against 1,200), funding raised ($4.9B against $348K).
Read the full Canonical review and pricing or the SUSE review and pricing. You can also browse other Canonical alternatives we track.