Canonical vs Cisco
Canonical vs Cisco, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Canonical is on 61/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
Canonical
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 1,200
- funding raised: $220B against $348K
At a glance
| Measure | Canonical | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Canonical develops and supports Ubuntu, a leading open-source operating system for cloud, servers, and edge devices. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Open Source, Operating System, Cloud Computing, Enterprise Software | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2004 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Canonical | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,200 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $348K | $220B |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Canonical | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Canonical | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Canonical vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, Canonical or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Canonical and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), headcount (95,924 against 1,200), funding raised ($220B against $348K).
Read the full Canonical review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other Canonical alternatives we track.