Camereyes vs Oncohost
Camereyes vs Oncohost, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Camereyes is on 45/100 and Oncohost on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Camereyes
- agent readiness: 26/100 against 21/100
Oncohost
- our overall score: 54/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 46 against 1
- funding raised: $43.0M against $700K
- LinkedIn following: 5,471 against 73
At a glance
| Measure | Camereyes | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered diagnostic imaging for early detection of diabetic retinopathy. | Leveraging proteomic pattern analysis to personalize cancer treatment and improve patient outcomes. |
| Category | Healthcare, Optometry, Diabetic Retinopathy, Retina | Healthcare, Pharmaceutical, Oncology, Cancer |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Camereyes | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 46 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +22.3% |
| Total funding | $700K | $43.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 73 | 5,471 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Camereyes | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 21/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Camereyes | Oncohost |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
Camereyes vs Oncohost: common questions
Which is better, Camereyes or Oncohost?
On our 0-100 score Oncohost rates higher (54/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Camereyes and Oncohost compare on the numbers?
Camereyes leads on agent readiness (26/100 against 21/100). Oncohost leads on our overall score (54/100 against 45/100), domain rating (31/100 against 1/100), headcount (46 against 1), funding raised ($43.0M against $700K), LinkedIn following (5,471 against 73).
Read the full Camereyes review and pricing or the Oncohost review and pricing. You can also browse other Camereyes alternatives we track.