CameraMatics vs GOARC
CameraMatics vs GOARC, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CameraMatics is on 57/100 and GOARC on 55/100.
Where each one leads
CameraMatics
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 139 against 28
- funding raised: $121M against $8.4M
- LinkedIn following: 9,245 against 3,898
GOARC
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CameraMatics | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered video telematics and fleet intelligence platform. | Real-time safety intelligence platform for industrial sectors to prevent accidents and reduce risks. |
| Category | Fleet Management, Artificial Intelligence, Telematics, Video Telematics | Safety, Industrial, Security, Employee Risk |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Dublin, Ireland | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CameraMatics | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 139 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -17.9% |
| Total funding | $121M | $8.4M |
| Latest round | Growth | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,245 | 3,898 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CameraMatics | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CameraMatics | GOARC |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Lovable |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
CameraMatics vs GOARC: common questions
Which is better, CameraMatics or GOARC?
On our 0-100 score CameraMatics rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CameraMatics and GOARC compare on the numbers?
CameraMatics leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 32/100), domain rating (39/100 against 30/100), headcount (139 against 28), funding raised ($121M against $8.4M), LinkedIn following (9,245 against 3,898).
Read the full CameraMatics review and pricing or the GOARC review and pricing. You can also browse other CameraMatics alternatives we track.