Calyxo vs Sub-Q Bionics
Calyxo vs Sub-Q Bionics, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Calyxo is on 55/100 and Sub-Q Bionics on 33/100.
Where each one leads
Calyxo
- our overall score: 55/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $151M against $1.5M
Sub-Q Bionics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Calyxo | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Redefining kidney stone treatment with an aspiration-based stone removal system. | Developing next-generation solutions to improve care for patients living with lymphedema. |
| Category | Medical Devices, HealthTech, Biotechnology, MedTech | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Pleasanton, USA | Stillwater, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Calyxo | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| Open roles | 21 | Not published |
| Total funding | $151M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Series F | Pre-Seed |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Calyxo | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 31/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Calyxo | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Calyxo vs Sub-Q Bionics: common questions
Which is better, Calyxo or Sub-Q Bionics?
On our 0-100 score Calyxo rates higher (55/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Calyxo and Sub-Q Bionics compare on the numbers?
Calyxo leads on our overall score (55/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($151M against $1.5M).
Read the full Calyxo review and pricing or the Sub-Q Bionics review and pricing. You can also browse other Calyxo alternatives we track.