Calo vs Found
Calo vs Found, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Calo is on 42/100 and Found on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Calo
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 899 against 147
- LinkedIn following: 316,334 against 12,825
Found
- our overall score: 64/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $206M against $40.3M
At a glance
| Measure | Calo | Found |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for personalized nutrition and weight management. | Found offers individualized, medically-guided weight care programs combining medication and behavior change for achievable and maintainable weight loss. |
| Category | HealthTech, Nutrition, Weight Management, AI-Driven Health | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Weight Management, Digital Health |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Calo | Found |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 899 | 147 |
| Total funding | $40.3M | $206M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $600M |
| LinkedIn followers | 316,334 | 12,825 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Calo | Found |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Calo | Found |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Segment | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
Calo vs Found: common questions
Which is better, Calo or Found?
On our 0-100 score Found rates higher (64/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Calo and Found compare on the numbers?
Calo leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 47/100), headcount (899 against 147), LinkedIn following (316,334 against 12,825). Found leads on our overall score (64/100 against 42/100), domain rating (74/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($206M against $40.3M).
Read the full Calo review and pricing or the Found review and pricing. You can also browse other Calo alternatives we track.