CallMiner vs #floQast
CallMiner vs #floQast, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CallMiner is on 62/100 and #floQast on 67/100.
Where each one leads
CallMiner
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
#floQast
- our overall score: 67/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 862 against 333
- funding raised: $303M against $85.0M
At a glance
| Measure | CallMiner | #floQast |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered conversation intelligence and customer experience automation platform. | Cloud-based financial close management software that automates accounting processes using AI. |
| Category | Conversation Intelligence, Customer Experience (CX), AI-Powered Automation, Speech Analytics | Accounting Automation, Accounting Software, Financial Close Management, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | Los Angeles, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CallMiner | #floQast |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 333 | 862 |
| Total funding | $85.0M | $303M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 30,867 | 35,123 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CallMiner | #floQast |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CallMiner | #floQast |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
CallMiner vs #floQast: common questions
Which is better, CallMiner or #floQast?
On our 0-100 score #floQast rates higher (67/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CallMiner and #floQast compare on the numbers?
#floQast leads on our overall score (67/100 against 62/100), headcount (862 against 333), funding raised ($303M against $85.0M).
Read the full CallMiner review and pricing or the #floQast review and pricing. You can also browse other CallMiner alternatives we track.