CairnSurgical vs Francis Medical
CairnSurgical vs Francis Medical, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CairnSurgical is on 50/100 and Francis Medical on 51/100.
Where each one leads
CairnSurgical
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Francis Medical
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 27/100 against 20/100
- funding raised: $156M against $22.6M
At a glance
| Measure | CairnSurgical | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CairnSurgical is developing the Breast Cancer Locator™ System to improve breast-conserving surgery by enhancing tumor localization and tissue inspection. | Developing minimally invasive water vapor ablation therapy to treat prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. |
| Category | MedTech, Surgical Robotics, Medical Devices, Breast Cancer | MedTech, Urology, Oncology, Medical Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Maple Grove, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CairnSurgical | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 71 |
| Total funding | $22.6M | $156M |
| Latest round | Series A2 | Series C |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CairnSurgical | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CairnSurgical | Francis Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
CairnSurgical vs Francis Medical: common questions
Which is better, CairnSurgical or Francis Medical?
On our 0-100 score Francis Medical rates higher (51/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CairnSurgical and Francis Medical compare on the numbers?
Francis Medical leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), domain rating (27/100 against 20/100), funding raised ($156M against $22.6M).
Read the full CairnSurgical review and pricing or the Francis Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other CairnSurgical alternatives we track.