Cadeler vs Recurrent Energy
Cadeler vs Recurrent Energy, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cadeler is on 54/100 and Recurrent Energy on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Cadeler
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Recurrent Energy
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $500M against $175M
At a glance
| Measure | Cadeler | Recurrent Energy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading offshore wind installation company. | Global developer, owner, and operator of utility-scale solar and energy storage projects. |
| Category | Renewable Energy, Maritime, Construction | Renewable Energy, Solar, Energy Storage, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2019 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Copenhagen, Denmark | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cadeler | Recurrent Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 976 | 916 |
| Total funding | $175M | $500M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 830 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cadeler | Recurrent Energy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cadeler | Recurrent Energy |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Cadeler vs Recurrent Energy: common questions
Which is better, Cadeler or Recurrent Energy?
On our 0-100 score Recurrent Energy rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cadeler and Recurrent Energy compare on the numbers?
Recurrent Energy leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), domain rating (53/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($500M against $175M).
Read the full Cadeler review and pricing or the Recurrent Energy review and pricing. You can also browse other Cadeler alternatives we track.