C2A Security vs Imperva
C2A Security vs Imperva, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: C2A Security is on 50/100 and Imperva on 67/100.
Where each one leads
C2A Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 42
- funding raised: $75.7M against $7.7M
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 7,886
At a glance
| Measure | C2A Security | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Risk-driven DevSecOps for automotive and mobility companies. | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. |
| Category | Automotive, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Automotive Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | C2A Security | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 42 | 1,700 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $7.7M | $75.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $10.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,886 | 75,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | C2A Security | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | C2A Security | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
C2A Security vs Imperva: common questions
Which is better, C2A Security or Imperva?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do C2A Security and Imperva compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100), domain rating (84/100 against 41/100), headcount (1,700 against 42), funding raised ($75.7M against $7.7M), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 7,886).
Read the full C2A Security review and pricing or the Imperva review and pricing. You can also browse other C2A Security alternatives we track.