C1 Fund vs Utila
C1 Fund vs Utila, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: C1 Fund is on 47/100 and Utila on 60/100.
Where each one leads
C1 Fund
- funding raised: $100M against $51.5M
Utila
- our overall score: 60/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 51/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 85 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 10,677 against 1,647
At a glance
| Measure | C1 Fund | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A publicly traded closed-end fund providing public-market investors with exposure to late-stage digital asset services and technology companies. | Self-custody wallet platform and API for secure digital asset management and custom offerings. |
| Category | Digital Assets, Financial Services, Investment Fund, Fintech | Digital Assets, Wallet, Crypto, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, USA | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | C1 Fund | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +64.7% |
| Total funding | $100M | $51.5M |
| Latest round | IPO | Series A1 |
| Valuation | Not published | $180M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,647 | 10,677 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | C1 Fund | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | C1 Fund | Utila |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
C1 Fund vs Utila: common questions
Which is better, C1 Fund or Utila?
On our 0-100 score Utila rates higher (60/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do C1 Fund and Utila compare on the numbers?
C1 Fund leads on funding raised ($100M against $51.5M). Utila leads on our overall score (60/100 against 47/100), domain rating (51/100 against 19/100), headcount (85 against 8), LinkedIn following (10,677 against 1,647).
Read the full C1 Fund review and pricing or the Utila review and pricing. You can also browse other C1 Fund alternatives we track.