C Labs vs Fetch.ai
C Labs vs Fetch.ai, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: C Labs is on 37/100 and Fetch.ai on 53/100.
Where each one leads
C Labs
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fetch.ai
- our overall score: 53/100 against 37/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 18/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | C Labs | Fetch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | C Labs is building a decentralized, privacy-preserving platform for AI model development and deployment. | Decentralized network powering autonomous AI agents for discovery, collaboration, and transactions. |
| Category | Foundation Model, Decentralized AI, Privacy-Preserving AI, Federated Learning | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Multi-Agent Systems, Autonomous Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Cambridge, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | C Labs | Fetch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 89 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 22,140 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | C Labs | Fetch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 37/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 50/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 18/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | C Labs | Fetch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | C Labs | Fetch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | ASI:One Agentic LLMs, Agentverse Developer Platform, Flockx No-Code Agent Studio, Decentralized Network for AI Agents, uAgents Framework, Web3 Integration |
C Labs vs Fetch.ai: common questions
Which is better, C Labs or Fetch.ai?
On our 0-100 score Fetch.ai rates higher (53/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do C Labs and Fetch.ai compare on the numbers?
Fetch.ai leads on our overall score (53/100 against 37/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 31/100), domain rating (72/100 against 18/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $10.0M).
Read the full C Labs review and pricing or the Fetch.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other C Labs alternatives we track.