Byteprint vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
Byteprint vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Byteprint is on 6/100 and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Byteprint
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
- our overall score: 47/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 29/100
At a glance
| Measure | Byteprint | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A TLS fingerprint database captured locally from real software, served through one API. | Cybersecurity solutions for network, cloud, and hybrid workforces, leveraging threat intelligence and consulting. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Network Security, TLS Fingerprinting, API Platform | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Cloud Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Not published | תל אביב - יפו, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Byteprint | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 22,232 |
| Total funding | Not published | $55.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,908,870 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Byteprint | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Byteprint | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Byteprint vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Byteprint or Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings rates higher (47/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Byteprint and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings compare on the numbers?
Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings leads on our overall score (47/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 29/100).
Read the full Byteprint review and pricing or the Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Byteprint alternatives we track.