BuyWith vs Flow
BuyWith vs Flow, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BuyWith is on 53/100 and Flow on 67/100.
Where each one leads
BuyWith
- domain rating: 57/100 against 3/100
- LinkedIn following: 9,295 against 2,808
Flow
- our overall score: 67/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 24 against 17
- funding raised: $468M against $10.5M
At a glance
| Measure | BuyWith | Flow |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Live commerce platform connecting creators and brands for shoppable live streams. | AI-powered machine vision for frictionless autonomous retail checkout. |
| Category | Retail, E-commerce, Social Commerce, Marketplace | Retail, Monitor, MFG + SUPPLY CHAIN, RetailTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BuyWith | Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.5M | $468M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,295 | 2,808 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BuyWith | Flow |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BuyWith | Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
BuyWith vs Flow: common questions
Which is better, BuyWith or Flow?
On our 0-100 score Flow rates higher (67/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BuyWith and Flow compare on the numbers?
BuyWith leads on domain rating (57/100 against 3/100), LinkedIn following (9,295 against 2,808). Flow leads on our overall score (67/100 against 53/100), headcount (24 against 17), funding raised ($468M against $10.5M).
Read the full BuyWith review and pricing or the Flow review and pricing. You can also browse other BuyWith alternatives we track.