BuyWith vs Trigo
BuyWith vs Trigo, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BuyWith is on 53/100 and Trigo on 62/100.
Where each one leads
BuyWith
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Trigo
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 230 against 17
- headcount growth: +0.9% against -6.8%
- funding raised: $199M against $10.5M
- LinkedIn following: 19,975 against 9,295
At a glance
| Measure | BuyWith | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Live commerce platform connecting creators and brands for shoppable live streams. | Computer vision startup automating retail checkout with AI-powered item identification. |
| Category | Retail, E-commerce, Social Commerce, Marketplace | Retail, Visual Monitor, Checkout, Cashierless |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BuyWith | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 230 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.8% | +0.9% |
| Total funding | $10.5M | $199M |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,295 | 19,975 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BuyWith | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BuyWith | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
BuyWith vs Trigo: common questions
Which is better, BuyWith or Trigo?
On our 0-100 score Trigo rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BuyWith and Trigo compare on the numbers?
Trigo leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 33/100), headcount (230 against 17), headcount growth (+0.9% against -6.8%), funding raised ($199M against $10.5M), LinkedIn following (19,975 against 9,295).
Read the full BuyWith review and pricing or the Trigo review and pricing. You can also browse other BuyWith alternatives we track.