BuyWith vs Gymshark
BuyWith vs Gymshark, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BuyWith is on 53/100 and Gymshark on 66/100.
Where each one leads
BuyWith
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Gymshark
- our overall score: 66/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 2,500 against 17
- funding raised: $261M against $10.5M
- LinkedIn following: 401,437 against 9,295
At a glance
| Measure | BuyWith | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Live commerce platform connecting creators and brands for shoppable live streams. | Global fitness apparel and accessories brand known for its strong social media presence and community focus. |
| Category | Retail, E-commerce, Social Commerce, Marketplace | Retail, Fitness Apparel, Athleisure, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | E-commerce |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Solihull, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BuyWith | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 2,500 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.5M | $261M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,295 | 401,437 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BuyWith | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BuyWith | Gymshark |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Shopify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
BuyWith vs Gymshark: common questions
Which is better, BuyWith or Gymshark?
On our 0-100 score Gymshark rates higher (66/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BuyWith and Gymshark compare on the numbers?
Gymshark leads on our overall score (66/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 33/100), domain rating (79/100 against 57/100), headcount (2,500 against 17), funding raised ($261M against $10.5M), LinkedIn following (401,437 against 9,295).
Read the full BuyWith review and pricing or the Gymshark review and pricing. You can also browse other BuyWith alternatives we track.